Graph(s) of the week: Debt

This week I'll take a look at the cross country comparison of household, corporate and financial sector debt levels.

Figure 1. Household debt, % of GDP. Source: The Economist

Figure 2. Financial sector debt, % of GDP. Source: The Economist

Figure 3. Corporate (non-financial) private sector debt, as % of GDP.
Source: The Economist 

It is interesting to notice how the UK ranks top in household debt (almost a 100% of GDP) and financial sector debt (a staggering 220% of GDP), while coming (only) third in corporate debt (still over a 100% of GDP). The pre-crisis growth decade was obviously driven by debt accumulation in Britain painting an highly unsustainable picture of their economy. According to this, the UK could be in much worse shape than imagined. Its financial sector debt can partially be explained by the fact that a lot of financial institutions with London headquarters have global operations (as explained previously) so when they spread out the debt isn't that worrying. However, domestic companies and households were accumulating wealth on debt creation rather than value creation. The US paints a similar picture, with a lot of their household debt being tied up into mortgages. Easy obtainable credit and low interest rates sent distorted signals onto the market that encouraged private sector debt accumulation. This debt bubble had to burst eventually. 

Note: for Italy and Greece (not pictured), unsustainable government debt was the culprit. With government debt the story is a bit different since it cannot be so well hidden as household or corporate debt. It is much more sensitive to international investor sentiments and it is a signal that public finances need to be brought under control. This can be much harder to establish for other types of debt. 

Comments

  1. Charlie9 March 2012 at 10:10

    this is terrible.. What can the private sector do to fix this? I can only imagine massive lay-offs, big losses (both company losses and on mortgages), and years of destabilization uncertainty and low confidence.
    Does this mean the recession is far from over? Cause it all looks really gloom to me...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlie9 March 2012 at 10:12

      from the British perspective mostly, but Europe nor the US aren't far behind this negative scenario..

      Delete
  2. Anonymous10 March 2012 at 11:19

    you say that pre-crisis growth was driven on debt, but aren't these current debt levels? Didn't all these countries experience a big increase in debt after the crisis had already started, and mostly because of it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. John Turpin10 March 2012 at 12:36

    It seems that the financial corporate sector debt was adjusted to remove foreign owned debt, so that actually is only the debt held domestically, which is amazingly high

    ReplyDelete
  4. Vuk Vukovic11 March 2012 at 16:03

    @Charlie - it does indeed look gloom, but the private sector can and will eventually restructure with not necessarily big losses. For more on the corporate balance sheet restructuring, I recommend this good text.

    @anonymous - yes, they are, but they accumulated during the pre-crisis growth. As for the increase in debt after the crisis, you are referring to government debt, which isn't pictured here. Government debt did rise as a consequence of bailouts and higher deficits (less revenue from taxes due to failing housing and construction industries, and higher expenditures due to more unemployment benefits), but the private sector accumulated its debt mostly before the crisis.

    @John - that's true, thanks for pointing that out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Short-selling explained (case study: movie "Trading Places")

Image
After seeing the movie "Trading Places" (1983), starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd, for the thousandth time during the holiday season, I decided to write a quick post explaining what happened at the end of this movie that gets so many people puzzled (including me for the first couple of times I've seen it). This entertaining 80s comedy can actually teach you more about finance and trading than any other Hollywood movie (not counting documentaries), including the infamous "Wall Street" (1987), starring Michael Douglas as the ruthless Gordon Gecko, and especially the latest Scorsese film "The Wolf of Wall Street" (2013). Anyway, we all know the story from Trading Places. Dan Aykroyd plays a snobbish investor Louis Winthorpe ("the Third"), while Eddie Murphy plays a street con artist Billy Ray Valentine whose lives get reversed as a result of a bet between two cruel millionaires, the Duke brothers. The Dukes own a commodities bro
Read more

Economic history: mercantilism and international trade

Image
All too often during poor economic times many debunked economic fallacies of the past get reinvented. The reason is simple: a search for ideas and solutions alternative to the "mainstream" (however we define it) allows those who succumb to these fallacies to repeat the ancient errors classical economics was hoping to get rid of. The short-termism of politics plays a crucial role in the process of persistent perpetuation of such fallacies. This is why in times like these it is essential to go back in economic history and debunk some of the ideas that tend to surface repeatedly. In the following couple of posts, I attempt to do just that.  Misunderstanding trade  One of the most misunderstood areas of economics is international trade. More precisely, the idea that if we were to boost net exports - by subsidizing exports and constraining imports - we can achieve higher GDP growth. If one looks at the simple arithmetic of a standard Keynesian macro model: Y=C+I+G+NX, the
Read more

Rent-seeking explained: Removing barriers to entry in the taxi market

Image
The taxi market is undoubtedly one of the best examples of something economists like to call rent-seeking . What does this phenomenon stand for and why do economists (particularly political economists) devote a lot of attention to it?  The classical definition was given by Gordon Tullock back in his  1967  seminal paper "The welfare cost of tariffs, monopolies and theft" , even though the phrase itself was coined by Anne Krueger in 1974 .  Rent-seeking is a process of gaining private benefits through the political process (by lobbying or logrolling for example). It implies gaining protection for a certain privileged group, which in return promises political support, large campaign contributions, or even bribes. This protection varies from giving a monopoly status to a certain company, regulating market entry than hampers competition (such as introducing licences to specific occupations), imposing tariffs to import goods to protect the domestic industry, handing out su
Read more

Graphs (images) of the week: Separated by a border

Image
Usually comparing countries or regions requires looking at GDP growth data, GDP per capita, living standards, relative income or even the happiness index. But even a simple areal glimpse at the borders separating two systems can be more than enough to conclude which country is richer, healthier, more educated and on average more prosperous. It tells us that the causes of between-country differences have to be more than just climate, geography, culture or mentality. Particularly when the same nation is separated by nothing more than a border depicting the striking differences in political systems of the two countries (a classical example here are East and West Germany, but an equally good example can be North or South Korea).  As a result I found that the following set of images paint a better  picture  on between-country differences   than any existing data on global inequality.  The first one is from a  blog post I encountered on the Why Nations Fail blog, comparing the citi
Read more