Tracking the recovery (3): Business and Consumer Confidence

Continuing with the Recovery Tracking series in its third edition, we look at business and consumer confidence in the US, UK and Eurozone, comparing them to the situation from 6 months ago. The OECD once again offers the database of tracking these indicators, in particular the Business Confidence Indicator (BCI) and the Consumer Confidence Indicator (CCI). As I've mentioned in the previous post, the consumer and business confidence indicators will give us a more precise picture on the effects of Draghi's speech,  and whether or not ECB's actions came through where they haven't done so before (recall the previous actions done in August 2011, December 2011, April 2012, and so on, when the effect on business and consumer confidence was either negligible or nonexistent). 

Business confidence
Source: OECD Standardized Confidence Indicators. Latest data available
for February 2013. Click on graph to enlarge. 
So far, by simply looking at the main OECD business confidence indicators, it seems that things started to improve for businesses in most of European countries over the past 6 months, except for USA and Britain. They are the only ones experiencing a slight decline. For the US this was expected due to the fiscal cliff bargaining by the end of last year, while for the UK it does come as a bit of a surprise, since most of Europe's businesses were increasing in their confidence. I have included in each graph a straight line which is suppose to correspond to Mario Draghi's speech from the end of July 2012. It seems that businesses in many European (peripheral) countries took this "momentum" as a welcomed solution from the ECB. Greece is particularly encouraging as this is the first indicator that is starting to show good news for Greece in a long time. I have also included the upper right graph on the Nordic countries, where it was quite obvious that their business climate over the past couple of years was dependent on how things were shaping up in the rest of Europe at the time (with a certain lag of course). 

So far so good. Things are starting to improve, businesses are gaining more confidence, but Europe is still vulnerable to outside shocks, like the one in Cyprus. It will be interesting to see the reaction to this shock in a few months time. 

Consumer confidence 

Source: OECD Standardized Confidence Indicators. Latest data available
for February 2013. Data for Norway was unavailable. Click on graph to enlarge. 
Consumers were more careful, but even this data is showing sings of improvement, especially in the peripheral Eurozone economies. Although you can notice that the consumer confidence indicator didn't react immediately after the Draghi momentum as the business confidence did. This is normal as it takes time for the business confidence to translate into more investments, more expansion and more new jobs. With higher employment, aggregate consumer confidence will improve and eventually yield an increase in aggregate spending. This still has yet to happen in Eurozone, but the favourable conditions were created. Now it takes time to wait and see and hope for the best - which isn't the best possible solution out there, but with lack of political will to solve serious issues, I guess we're stuck with it.


However, to end on a more serious note, a survey done by the FT and the Economist with the final data for Q1 2013 point out that even though "overall confidence, measured as the balance of respondents who think global business conditions will improve against those who expect them to get worse, rose from a dismal minus 11 percentage points in the last quarter of 2012 to plus seven in the first quarter of 2013", a lot of businesses (around 80%, see graph below) still feel that the crisis is not over, and are skeptical on the current regulatory solutions. Also, one of the conclusions was that some of the new growing confidence is yet to be translated into new job opportunities (which is probably why we haven't yet seen a strong upward shift in consumer confidence from the graphs above).

Here are some of the figures depicting this sentiment:

Source: The Economist/FT global business barometer survey
Global confidence is improving for the first time since 2011, with some industries (like construction, services, chemicals and consumer goods) driving this positive change, while others are still in relative decline or stagnation (manufacturing being the most problematic since the start of the crisis).

Finally, the Markit Eurozone PMI (purchasing managers' index) indicator is showing a steady decline for the first quarter of 2013 (latest data in March), thanks to a contraction of business activity, which still means that the recovery in Eurozone is in a very fragile state. 

Comments

  1. Unknown6 April 2013 at 20:48

    I must say I was more "pessimistic" about effects of Draghi's words on the consumers and businesses. I tend see consumers primarily reacting to (un)employment numbers (trends) - not that Im right. But words without action can do only so much in long term....Im not sure if Euro crisis can ever be over when we take into account al the structural problems of the area (keeping constant the level of political idiocy) Btw have you seen the evolution of greek bond yields since Draghis "whatever it takes"
    http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/GGGB10YR:IND/chart .

    Greets
    PS. Nice review of the public choice conference on Banka

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vuk Vukovic7 April 2013 at 11:44

      So was I...I wasn't expecting such a confidence boost I must admit. And yes, this is something I forgot to mention in the text; Europe's economies should take this increase in confidence which brought about a bit of stability (or at least lowered the bond yields as you've shown), and use it to finally resolve their structural issues.

      Thanks :) If you liked that, I'm sure you'll like this radio show from yesterday. A few economists and myself were discussing some new theories of economic thought (new institutional economics, economic complexity, heterodox economics, etc.)

      Delete
    2. Isak10 April 2013 at 09:38

      Very nice radio show. Thumbs up for you and other economists and for Mr. Ivankovic for brining some light into a very dark and depressing media scene. I hope this trend continues:).

      Delete
  2. Anonymous21 September 2013 at 04:53

    Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your website in Ie, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, terrific blog!

    my webpage - brochure holder

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Short-selling explained (case study: movie "Trading Places")

Image
After seeing the movie "Trading Places" (1983), starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd, for the thousandth time during the holiday season, I decided to write a quick post explaining what happened at the end of this movie that gets so many people puzzled (including me for the first couple of times I've seen it). This entertaining 80s comedy can actually teach you more about finance and trading than any other Hollywood movie (not counting documentaries), including the infamous "Wall Street" (1987), starring Michael Douglas as the ruthless Gordon Gecko, and especially the latest Scorsese film "The Wolf of Wall Street" (2013). Anyway, we all know the story from Trading Places. Dan Aykroyd plays a snobbish investor Louis Winthorpe ("the Third"), while Eddie Murphy plays a street con artist Billy Ray Valentine whose lives get reversed as a result of a bet between two cruel millionaires, the Duke brothers. The Dukes own a commodities bro...
Read more

Economic history: mercantilism and international trade

Image
All too often during poor economic times many debunked economic fallacies of the past get reinvented. The reason is simple: a search for ideas and solutions alternative to the "mainstream" (however we define it) allows those who succumb to these fallacies to repeat the ancient errors classical economics was hoping to get rid of. The short-termism of politics plays a crucial role in the process of persistent perpetuation of such fallacies. This is why in times like these it is essential to go back in economic history and debunk some of the ideas that tend to surface repeatedly. In the following couple of posts, I attempt to do just that.  Misunderstanding trade  One of the most misunderstood areas of economics is international trade. More precisely, the idea that if we were to boost net exports - by subsidizing exports and constraining imports - we can achieve higher GDP growth. If one looks at the simple arithmetic of a standard Keynesian macro model: Y=C+I+G+NX, the...
Read more

Rent-seeking explained: Removing barriers to entry in the taxi market

Image
The taxi market is undoubtedly one of the best examples of something economists like to call rent-seeking . What does this phenomenon stand for and why do economists (particularly political economists) devote a lot of attention to it?  The classical definition was given by Gordon Tullock back in his  1967  seminal paper "The welfare cost of tariffs, monopolies and theft" , even though the phrase itself was coined by Anne Krueger in 1974 .  Rent-seeking is a process of gaining private benefits through the political process (by lobbying or logrolling for example). It implies gaining protection for a certain privileged group, which in return promises political support, large campaign contributions, or even bribes. This protection varies from giving a monopoly status to a certain company, regulating market entry than hampers competition (such as introducing licences to specific occupations), imposing tariffs to import goods to protect the domestic indus...
Read more

Graphs (images) of the week: Separated by a border

Image
Usually comparing countries or regions requires looking at GDP growth data, GDP per capita, living standards, relative income or even the happiness index. But even a simple areal glimpse at the borders separating two systems can be more than enough to conclude which country is richer, healthier, more educated and on average more prosperous. It tells us that the causes of between-country differences have to be more than just climate, geography, culture or mentality. Particularly when the same nation is separated by nothing more than a border depicting the striking differences in political systems of the two countries (a classical example here are East and West Germany, but an equally good example can be North or South Korea).  As a result I found that the following set of images paint a better  picture  on between-country differences   than any existing data on global inequality.  The first one is from a  blog post I encountered on the Why Nations ...
Read more